Image from Google Jackets

Content validity testing of the maternal fetal triage index / Catherine Ruhl, Benjamin Scheich, Brea Onokpise, Debra Bingham

By: Contributor(s): Series: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 44 : 6, page 701-709 Publication details: November-December 2015.Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
Subject(s): Summary: "Objective To describe the development and content validity testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index (MFTI), a standardized tool for obstetric triage. Design Online survey. Participants Participants included 15 registered nurses, 15 certified nurse-midwives, and 15 physicians from across the United States who provided maternity care. Methods A convenience sample of experienced clinicians was used as content validators for the MFTI. An item content validity index (I-CVI) was computed for the tool's items and a scale content validity index (S-CVI) was computed for the tool's scale based on the responses submitted via the online survey. Two rounds of content validation occurred. Results In the first round of testing, a total of 12 of 61 items in the MFTI did not meet the I-CVI threshold of greater than 0.78 because of disagreement about clinical condition (75%) or priority level placement (25%). In the second round of testing, all but 3 of the 69 content items in the revised version of the MFTI had I-CVI thresholds greater than 0.78. These 3 items were related to vital sign values. The overall S-CVI score calculated for Round 2 only was 0.95, whichwas greater than the threshold of 0.90. Conclusion The results of the content validity testing of multidisciplinary validators suggest that the MFTI is a valid tool for use in obstetric triage and evaluation settings."
Item type: Articles
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

"Objective To describe the development and content validity testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index (MFTI), a standardized tool for obstetric triage. Design Online survey. Participants Participants included 15 registered nurses, 15 certified nurse-midwives, and 15 physicians from across the United States who provided maternity care. Methods A convenience sample of experienced clinicians was used as content validators for the MFTI. An item content validity index (I-CVI) was computed for the tool's items and a scale content validity index (S-CVI) was computed for the tool's scale based on the responses submitted via the online survey. Two rounds of content validation occurred. Results In the first round of testing, a total of 12 of 61 items in the MFTI did not meet the I-CVI threshold of greater than 0.78 because of disagreement about clinical condition (75%) or priority level placement (25%). In the second round of testing, all but 3 of the 69 content items in the revised version of the MFTI had I-CVI thresholds greater than 0.78. These 3 items were related to vital sign values. The overall S-CVI score calculated for Round 2 only was 0.95, whichwas greater than the threshold of 0.90. Conclusion The results of the content validity testing of multidisciplinary validators suggest that the MFTI is a valid tool for use in obstetric triage and evaluation settings."

Nursing

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Manila Tytana Colleges Library | Metropolitan Park, Pres. Diosdado Macapagal Blvd., Pasay City, 1300
Tel.(+63-2) 859-0826 | E-mail library@mtc.edu.ph