Image from Google Jackets

Disclosure practices of listed Philippine mining companies, 2006-2010 / Jay Stephen Siy

By: Series: Philippine Management Review. 20, page 83-110 Publication details: 2013Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
Subject(s): Summary: The paper examines the disclosure practices of seventeen listed mining companies in the Philippines focusing on two frameworks: mineral and financial reporting. A comparative study of the annual reports of listed mining companies is performed from 2006 to 2010. The period of analysis is significant following major developments in public reporting. Chief among them is the implementation of the Philippine Financial Reporting Standard 6 in 2006 and the adoption of the Philippine Mineral Reporting Code in 2007. The findings indicate reduced comparability as a result of: (1) non-compliance with the mineral reporting code; (2) non-disclosure of mineral assets; (3) varying treatments of exploration and evaluation costs; and, (4) inconsistent mineral and ore category definitions as a result of weak integration between the frameworks. These public reporting issues prevent meaningful assessment by users undermining investment attractiveness and the ability of mining companies to communicate their performance and potentials.
Item type: Analytics
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Manila Tytana Colleges Library REFERENCE SECTION Bound (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available

The paper examines the disclosure practices of seventeen listed mining companies in the Philippines focusing on two frameworks: mineral and financial reporting. A comparative study of the annual reports of listed mining companies is performed from 2006 to 2010. The period of analysis is significant following major developments in public reporting. Chief among them is the implementation of the Philippine Financial Reporting Standard 6 in 2006 and the adoption of the Philippine Mineral Reporting Code in 2007. The findings indicate reduced comparability as a result of: (1) non-compliance with the mineral reporting code; (2) non-disclosure of mineral assets; (3) varying treatments of exploration and evaluation costs; and, (4) inconsistent mineral and ore category definitions as a result of weak integration between the frameworks. These public reporting issues prevent meaningful assessment by users undermining investment attractiveness and the ability of mining companies to communicate their performance and potentials.

Business Administration

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Manila Tytana Colleges Library | Metropolitan Park, Pres. Diosdado Macapagal Blvd., Pasay City, 1300
Tel.(+63-2) 859-0826 | E-mail library@mtc.edu.ph