Questioning the end effect : endings are not inherently over-weighted in retrospective evaluations of experiences / Stephanie Tully, Tom Meyvis
Series: Journal of Experimental Psychology : General. 145 : 5, page 630-642 Publication details: May 2016Content type:- txt
- unmediated
- volumes
Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manila Tytana Colleges Library REFERENCE SECTION | Bound (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Browsing Manila Tytana Colleges Library shelves, Shelving location: REFERENCE SECTION Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The present research re-examines one of the most basic assertions regarding the evaluation of hedonic experiences: the end effect. The end effect suggests that the retrospective evaluation of an experience is disproportionately influenced by the final moments of the experience. The findings in this article indicate that endings are not inherently over-weighted in retrospective evaluations. That is, episodes do not disproportionately affect the evaluation of an experience simply because they occur at the end. We replicate findings that are consistent with the end effect, but provide additional evidence implicating other processes as driving factors of those findings.
Psychology
There are no comments on this title.