No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages : a test of four hypotheses / Claudia C. von Bastian, Alessandra S. Souza, Miriam Gade
Series: Journal of Experimental Psychology : General. 145 : 2 page 246-258 Publication details: February 2016.Content type:- txt
- unmediated
- volume
Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manila Tytana Colleges Library REFERENCE SECTION | Bound (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Browsing Manila Tytana Colleges Library shelves, Shelving location: REFERENCE SECTION Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The question whether being bilingual yields cognitive benefits is highly controversial with prior studies providing inconsistent results. Failures to replicate the bilingual advantage have been attributed to methodological factors such as comparing dichotomous groups and measuring cognitive abilities separately with single tasks. Therefore, the authors evaluated the 4 most prominent hypotheses of bilingual advantages for inhibitory control, conflict monitoring, shifting, and general cognitive performance by assessing bilingualism on 3 continuous dimensions (age of acquisition, proficiency, and usage) in a sample of 118 young adults and relating it to 9 cognitive abilities each measured by multiple tasks. Linear mixed-effects models accounting for multiple sources of variance simultaneously and controlling for parents' education as an index of socioeconomic status revealed no evidence for any of the 4 hypotheses. Hence, the authors' results suggest that bilingual benefits are not as broad and as robust as has been previously claimed. Instead, earlier effects were possibly due to task-specific effects in selective and often small samples.
Psychology
There are no comments on this title.