MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01980nam a2200253Ia 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
181030s2016 xx 000 0 und d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Transcribing agency |
MANILA TYTANA COLLEGES LIBRARY |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
von Hecker, Ulrich. |
| 245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Spatial representation of coherence / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Ulrich von Hecker, Ulrike Hahn, Jasmine Rollings |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
July 2016 |
| 336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
|---|
| Content type term |
text |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
|---|
| Media type term |
unmediated |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
|---|
| Carrier type term |
volume |
| 440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE |
|---|
| Number of part/section of a work |
145 : 7, page 853-871 |
| Title |
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Four experiments examined spatial correlates of the experience of coherence, that is, the extent to which propositions "fit together." Experiment 1 demonstrates for Heiderian triads (i.e., sets of liking/disliking relations between 3 fictitious persons) that name pairs from balanced triads, such as 2 friends commonly disliking a third person (high coherence) are seen as closer to each other in physical space as compared to name pairs from unbalanced triads, such as 2 persons disliking each other and having a common friend (low coherence). This pattern of results is conceptually replicated in 2 further experiments for categorical syllogisms. Two terms in conclusions from valid syllogisms (high coherence) were seen as spatially closer to each other than when 2 terms came from invalid syllogisms (low coherence). In the final 2 experiments, similar closeness effects are demonstrated for word pairs from scenarios that "made sense" in terms of causal connectedness (latent causality) as opposed to word pairs from scenarios perceived as causally unconnected. These findings are discussed in the context of spatial binding theories, applied psychology, and embodied cognition in general, and their methodological implications are highlighted. |
| 521 ## - TARGET AUDIENCE NOTE |
|---|
| Target audience note |
Psychology. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Analysis. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Causal binding. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Coherence. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Spatial ability. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Syllogistic reasoning. |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Library of Congress Classification |
| Koha item type |
Articles |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) |
|---|
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) |
82897 |
| First Date, FD (RLIN) |
141260 |
