000 | 01974nam a2200241Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 240430s2009 xx 000 0 und d | ||
040 | _cManila Tytana Colleges | ||
100 |
_aRovee-Collier, Carolyn. _912867 |
||
245 | 0 |
_aMultiple memory systems are unnecessary to account for infant memory development : _ban ecological model / _cCarolyn Rovee-Collier, Kimberly Cuevas |
|
260 | _cJanuary 2009 | ||
336 | _atext | ||
337 | _avolume | ||
338 | _aunmediated | ||
440 |
_n45 : 1, pages 160-174 _aDevelopmental Psychology _912868 |
||
520 | _aHow the memory of adults evolves from the memory abilities of infants is a central problem in cognitive development. The popular solution holds that the multiple memory systems of adults mature at different rates during infancy. The early-maturing system (implicit or nondeclarative memory) functions automatically from birth, whereas the late-maturing system (explicit or declarative memory) functions intentionally, with awareness, from late in the first year. Data are presented from research on deferred imitation, sensory preconditioning, potentiation, and context for which this solution cannot account and present an alternative model that eschews the need for multiple memory systems. The ecological model of infant memory development (N. E. Spear, 1984) holds that members of all species are perfectly adapted to their niche at each point in ontogeny and exhibit effective, evolutionarily selected solutions to whatever challenges each new niche poses. Because adults and infants occupy different niches, what they perceive, learn, and remember about the same event differs, but their raw capacity to learn and remember does not. | ||
521 | _aPsychology. | ||
650 |
_aEcological model of memory development. _912869 |
||
650 |
_aInfant memory development. _912870 |
||
650 |
_aMultiple memory systems. _912871 |
||
650 |
_aPotentiation. _912872 |
||
650 |
_aSensory preconditioning. _912873 |
||
942 | _cA | ||
999 |
_c86560 _d86560 |