000 02878nam a2200241Ia 4500
008 230425s2017 xx 000 0 und d
040 _cManila Tytana Colleges
100 _aChristoph, Mary J.
_93683
245 2 _aA cross-sectional study of the relationship between nutrition label use and food selection, servings, and consumption in a university dining setting /
_cMary J. Christoph, Brenna Ellison
260 _cOctober 2017
336 _atext
337 _aunmediated
338 _avolume
440 _n117 : 10, pages 1528-1537
_aJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
_93684
520 _aBackground: Nutrition labels at the point of purchase are recommended to improve food choice, yet food choice does not always translate into food consumption. It is important to understand the relationship between label use, food selection, servings, and consumption. Previous research, which has relied on self-reported intake or inferred label use or intake based on sales data, has not adequately answered this question Objective: To combine survey and meal photographic data to compare food selection, servings, and consumption between label users and nonusers. Design: Diners were surveyed in two cross-sectional waves during the fall 2014 semester. Food selections were recorded, and pre- and postmeal photographs were taken of diners' plate. Photographs were coded to identify the selection, servings, and consumption of MyPlate food categories. Participants/setting: Convenience sample of 1,069 diners (39% women, 53% freshman) in two university dining halls. Students had to be older than age 18 years and just beginning their meal to participate. Main outcome measures: Selection, servings, and consumption of MyPlate food categories for label users and nonusers. Statistical analyses performed: Differences in food selection were tested via χ2 tests, and differences in adjusted least squares means for servings and consumption were tested via t tests. Results: A greater proportion of nutrition label users selected fruits, vegetables, and beans and fewer selected potatoes compared with nonusers. In addition, fewer label users selected fried foods and foods with added sugars (all P values <0.05). Label users served themselves and consumed more vegetables and fewer potatoes and refined grains compared with nonusers (all P values <0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest label users behave differently compared with nonusers. Based on the meals observed, these differences appear more qualitative in nature (selecting different foods) than quantitative (selecting more or less food).
521 _aNutrition.
650 _aCollege or university setting.
_93685
650 _aDigital photography.
_93686
650 _aFood consumption.
_93687
650 _aFood selection.
_93688
650 _aNutrition label use.
_93689
942 _cA
999 _c84346
_d84346