000 02222nab a22002777a 4500
003 PILC
005 20221123182303.0
008 150723s9999 xx 000 0 und d
040 _cMANILA TYTANA COLLEGES LIBRARY
100 _aRuhl, Catherine.
245 0 _aContent validity testing of the maternal fetal triage index /
_cCatherine Ruhl, Benjamin Scheich, Brea Onokpise, Debra Bingham
260 _cNovember-December 2015.
336 _atext
337 _aunmediated
338 _avolume
440 _aJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
_n44 : 6, page 701-709
520 _a"Objective To describe the development and content validity testing of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index (MFTI), a standardized tool for obstetric triage. Design Online survey. Participants Participants included 15 registered nurses, 15 certified nurse-midwives, and 15 physicians from across the United States who provided maternity care. Methods A convenience sample of experienced clinicians was used as content validators for the MFTI. An item content validity index (I-CVI) was computed for the tool's items and a scale content validity index (S-CVI) was computed for the tool's scale based on the responses submitted via the online survey. Two rounds of content validation occurred. Results In the first round of testing, a total of 12 of 61 items in the MFTI did not meet the I-CVI threshold of greater than 0.78 because of disagreement about clinical condition (75%) or priority level placement (25%). In the second round of testing, all but 3 of the 69 content items in the revised version of the MFTI had I-CVI thresholds greater than 0.78. These 3 items were related to vital sign values. The overall S-CVI score calculated for Round 2 only was 0.95, whichwas greater than the threshold of 0.90. Conclusion The results of the content validity testing of multidisciplinary validators suggest that the MFTI is a valid tool for use in obstetric triage and evaluation settings."
521 _aNursing
650 _aObstetrics.
650 _aTriage (Medicine).
700 _aScheich, Benjamin.
700 _aOnokpise, Brea.
700 _aBingham, Debra.
942 _cA
_2lcc
998 _c80430
_d138793
999 _c77431
_d77431