000			02006nab a22002657a 4500
003			PILC
005			20221123182210.0
008			150723s9999 xx 000 0 und d
040			_cMANILA TYTANA COLLEGES LIBRARY
100			_aFincher, Katrina M.
245			_aPerceptual dehumanization of faces is activated by norm violations and facilitates norm enhancement / _cKatrina M. Fincher, Philip E. Tetlock
260			_cFebruary 2016.
336			_atxt
337			_aunmediated
338			_avolume
440			_aJournal of Experimental Psychology : General _n145 : 2 page 131-146
520			_aThis article uses methods drawn from perceptual psychology to answer a basic social psychological question: Do people process the faces of norm violators differently from those of others-and, if so, what is the functional significance? Seven studies suggest that people process these faces different and the differential processing makes it easier to punish norm violators. Studies 1 and 2 use a recognition-recall paradigm that manipulated facial-inversion and spatial frequency to show that people rely upon face-typical processing less when they perceive norm violators' faces. Study 3 uses a facial composite task to demonstrate that the effect is actor dependent, not action dependent, and to suggest that configural processing is the mechanism of perceptual change. Studies 4 and 5 use offset faces to show that configural processing is only attenuated when they belong to perpetrators who are culpable. Studies 6 and 7 show that people find it easier to punish inverted faces and harder to punish faces displayed in low spatial frequency. Taken together, these data suggest a bidirectional flow of causality between lower-order perceptual and higher-order cognitive processes in norm enforcement.
521			_aPsychology
650			_aDehumanization.
650			_aSocial psychology.
650			_aPunishment.
650			_aFace processing.
942			_cA _2lcc
998			_c78649 _d137012
999			_c75676 _d75676